"The ‘Jump London’ project aims to create 500 new Parkour/Freerunning coaches between now and the Games creating more opportunities for people to participate in the sport of Parkour."

What is the motivation behind wanting to create so many new coaches, and also within such a relatively short space of time?

I'd argue that creating more coaches doesn't necessarily equal more opportunities for participation.  Unless perhaps, the classes are free?

Do you think that any effort should be spent on promoting the idea of learning for yourself or learning from other people, as opposed to seeking out someone 'qualified'?

Is this push to get so many PUK/A.D.A.P.T qualified teachers meant to be part of a slow progression toward having the 'sport of Parkour' heavily regulated and ultimately controlled by PUK/PKG?  The thin end of a wedge maybe?

"Parkour UK’s Qualifications meet the international A.D.A.P.T standard."

Of what significance is it that the PUK qualifications meet the A.D.A.P.T standard? Isn't that a bit like setting yourself a test, taking it and passing 100%, and then giving yourself a pat on the back for a job well done?

"The Inspire mark will be awarded to specific projects and events which are:

Fully funded from non-commercial sources and with no commercial association."

How did Parkour UK get the award when they are essentially are PKG under a different name? Does that count as 'commerical association?'

It seems rather convenient being able to switch between two roles; one being a benevolent 'not-for-profit national governing body', and the other being a commercial enterprise. One hand washing the other.

Just some thoughts.